Civil Engineering - UBC  
 
UBC Insitu Testing Logo
Home - Civil Engineering
Home - Geotechnical Research
Experimental Research
Home - SPT Energy


Dept. of Civil Engineering, UBC, 2324 Main Mall, Rm 2010, Vancouver, BC, Canada, V6T 1Z4, Telephone (604) 822-2637, Fax (604) 822-6901, Email: info@civil.ubc.ca


Search


Energy Measurement in the Standard Penetration Test (SPT)
Civil Home >> Geotechnical Research >> Experimental Research >> SPT Energy Main Page

The SPT Test

What is SPT?
"SPT" is an abbreviation for the Standard Penetration Test, which is the most widely used in-situ soil characterization test in North America.

The SPT test involves driving a standard cylindrical sampler into the bottom of a borehole. The total blows required from a hammer, over the interval 150 to 450 mm (6 to 18 inches) are summed to give the blow count N, in blows per foot.

The N-value is used as a basis for foundation design and as the primary index of liquefaction resistance.

Why is the SPT so popular?
The popularity of the Standard Penetration Test can be attributed to both the ease of the test as well as the inexpensive cost. The continued popularity of the SPT is due to the many design correlations associated with the SPT - N value, such as allowable bearing pressure and liquefaction potential.

Where is the SPT used?
SPT is used world-wide, and in North America, the Standard Penetration Test is the most widely used in-situ soil characterization test.

Why are we concerned about energy?
Several investigators have measured the hammer energy in various SPT systems and found considerable variability. Schmertmann and Palacios (1979) showed experimentally that the measured blow count was inversely proportional to the energy delivered to the drill rods for blow counts less than 50. Because of the variable energy input from different SPT hammer/rod systems, Seed et al. (1985) suggested that measured blow counts (N-value) be corrected to reference value of 60% of the potential energy of the SPT hammer. The 60% reference energy was adopted because energy measurements carried out at that time, mostly on safety hammers, indicated an average of about 60% of the theoretical potential energy of the SPT.

This generalized approach to dealing with energy variations is questionable because it does not consider details of the hammer and rod system.

Why is the SPT really a coarse, problematic test?
The range of acceptable dimensions for split spoon samplers given in ASTM D1586 is shown here. The standard is much less specific about the required design of the SPT hammer, stating only that the hammer must have a mass of 140 lbs (63.5 kg) and must drop vertically as freely as possible through 30" (0.76 m) before hitting the anvil. As a result, different hammer designs have evolved and they vary considerably. The most commonly used hammer types in North America are the donut, safety and automatic hammers, as shown in the following figure.

Different combinations of drill rig, hammer, rods and drillers lead to wide variations in energy delivered to the rods.

Knowledge of the impact velocity would set an upper limit on the possible energy delivered to the rods. The following figure illustrates that a small decrease in the impact velocity due to friction can result in a considerable reduction in the available kinetic energy at impact.
<< back
(Return Home to Experimental Research)
next page >>
(return to experimental research)

Geotechnical Research | Experimental Research
Analytical Research | Historical Research